Organization Development has been understood--and misunderstood--in a variety of ways by different people at different times. It can be helpful to know how the field got started.
When I was a grad student at UCLA, I learned from mentors like Bob Tannenbaum and Jim Clark that OD emerged from the growing awareness that Management Development, even when very successful, had major limitations. Key managers could be immersed in powerful training experiences like T Groups, developing a fundamentally different understanding of themselves and their interaction with people, but when they returned to their organization they faced three difficult choices:
1. They could become change agents, leading their organization toward significant new ways of being and working--very few people managed to do this.
2. They could become trouble-makers, out of step with their peers and subordinates' assumptions and expectations, working uphill to create change that nobody seemed to believe in or want. Some people did this for a while, and then gave up, or they were neutralized or expelled as an alien organism from their organization. A few left purposely, and even changed their chosen profession, becoming writers, sculptors, etc.
3. They could unlearn what they had learned and go back to their old way of doing things, encapsulating their brief departure from the norm as a temporary aberration, hopeful but naïve; most managers chose this option, and achieved it rather quickly.
So there was something not working with Management Development--the development of managers as individuals. The underlying assumption that you could change an organization by changing individuals did not pan out. Time for a paradigm shift.
Borrowing from what were then new developments in family therapy, such as the work of Virginia Satir, some applied social scientists and consultants began to consider the need to develop the organization as a whole, not just the individuals within it. Family therapists were learning that they could treat a problem child with apparent success, but on returning to the family s/he promptly reverted to the previous problem behavior. The problem was not in the child as an individual, but in the family as a system. Similarly, an organization could be improved not by developing individuals within it, but by changing the organization as a whole--hence the shift in thinking--from management development, to organization development.
Think about some problem in your own organization. Consider how it can be interpreted in terms of the problematic behavior of a particular individual. Then consider how this behavior might be an expression of the organization's unacknowledged, perhaps unmentionable problematic patterns.
What thoughts or questions do you have about this, or about OD, or about the OD Program at Sonoma State? Use the Comments link below to respond to or comment on this entry.
Enter you email in the field on the right to receive notification when new entries are posted here.
Thank you for this concise story about the origins of OD. Everyday at work I see the same kind of thinking that you decribe here, the drift back to the status quo when the system itself is left untended. I find it can be revolutionary when you can shift this perspective even a little to a systems approach. This can be so challenging when groups are entrenched in their patterns. Take self managed work teams. They were instituted in our manufacturing organization several years ago. The employees and supervisors were given some training about their roles and team dynamics. The goal was more employee involvment and to absorb core support so that the direct labor supplied the support services with hands on knowledge of the system. It sounds good, but after some time, the system fell apart and every thing migrated back to silos within each product area. To me, it seems that we need a transition period with very strong support, training, and leadership while the teams find their own leadership and best ways of doing things. It seems that just dropping them off of cliffs without being on belay and expecting them not to fall, is unreasonable. I am interested is what others think or suggestions your might have.
Posted by: Jessica at May 27, 2005 05:50 AM