Archived files regarding the no confidence vote in President Armiñana in 2007
Pro and Con arguments
Chairs' statement after vote
At its meeting of May 10th, the Senate approved the resolution (above) authorizing a referendum vote of no confidence in President Arminana. The voting is now over. The results are: 73.4% of faculty voting in the referendum voted no confidence in President Arminana's leadership. The turn out was 68% of eligible faculty. This means that at least 50% of eligible faculty at SSU expressed no confidence.
Further comments from Senate Leadership: It now falls to the faculty leadership to attempt to interpret these results and propose some next steps. Although the vote focused appropriately on the President’s leadership as the CEO, it also represents an assessment of the support for administrative priorities over the last 15 years. The significant number of "yes" votes can be interpreted to mean faculty believe that there has been a failure to align institutional priorities with the campus mission, in particular with the core academic mission of student learning and mentoring. It can also be seen as an endorsement of the faculty leadership who have emphasized the centrality of teaching and learning to that mission. For SSU to retain its reputation as an excellent liberal arts and sciences university, faculty efforts to develop innovative curriculum, provide close mentoring relationships with students, and participate fully in creative and scholarly pursuits must be supported by an administration engaged with our academic mission. One possible solution going forward could be to engage a professional mediator to facilitate a conflict resolution process involving faculty and administrative leadership that would attempt to find common ground for such collaboration. The current faculty leadership hope that such a process would be welcomed by the President.
Assoc. Professor of Mathematics
Faculty Chair, Academic Senate
Assoc. Professor of English
Chair Elect, Academic Senate