SSU home

..Biology Department home

Biotechnology Presentations

Home | Site Map | Syllabus | Schedule | Presentations | Links

.

Debate Format

Note: The following may be modified somewhat by the presenters, but this will give you an idea of what to expect.

 

GENERAL DEBATE RULES

A. Debaters should prepare slides and adhere to the basics for giving a good talk.

B. Debate Rules

Some basic readings will be assigned to the class covering the debate topic. To win (or do well in the debate), each debater will have to do outside reading (papers, conferences) on the topic in order to have sufficient mastery to argue and rebut.

1. Debates shall be organized as follows:

Constructive Speeches:
Affirmative 20 minutes

Negative 20 minutes

Rebuttal Speeches:

Affirmative 10 minutes

Negative 10 minutes

Affirmative 5 minutes

Negative 5 minutes

Discussion and Cross-Examination by Jury [class] (about 40 minutes).

Questions for debaters and Cross Examination (about 10 minutes).

Vote on winner.

Discussion of Debate topic (about 30 Minutes).

A timekeeper selected from the class will keep time.

2. Rules of Evidence

In debate, source citations of evidence must be stated the first time a source is used.

3. Rules of Evidence Authenticity

Evidence must not be fabricated or distorted, in penalty of losing the debate.

Authenticity refers to:

1) Fabrication: falsely representing a cited fact or statement of opinion as evidence; or intentional omission/addition of information within quoted material.

2) Distortion: misrepresentation of evidence or of citation which significantly alters meaning or content.

In your debate, you should be sure to describe the basic concepts in adequate detail so that the jury (the class) can follow.

 

How to Win a Debate

In order to win, debaters will need to do a literature search and some extra reading (beyond the assigned papers) in order to assemble an adequate armamentarium of technical material.

The best way to win a debate is to make the most convincing technical and/or ethical arguments in favor of your assigned position (pro or con). For example, you could argue that, while, a particular technique is claimed to work on certain cloning problems, the ethical issues raised due to the means of cell collection in the first place outweighs the benefits. Or you could perform a careful complexity, soundness, or completeness analysis to demonstrate your point. Or you could compare other methods of solutions to that of cloning.

Arguments by authority ("Bill Clinton claims that X, and I believe him"; "Kary B. Mullis, a Nobel Prize winner, believes Y is bad, so we should too") should not be used.

However, precise technical arguments ("Cybenko [give ref] has proven that any continuous stem cell line can be modeled into differentiating tissues") and technical rebuttals ("Yes, but Cybenko's construction requires an exponential number of hidden control points-- great expressive power at great expense is not useful!") are excellent debating points.

You must argue aggressively for your assigned position (pro or con). Never say "Well, I've been assigned pro, but I really agree more with con." This marks you as a loser, and you will lose the debate!

 

.

Home | Site Map | Syllabus | Schedule | Presentations | Links

 Updated 4/14/03 by thatcher@sonoma.edu