Sonoma State University

Department of Engineering Science

ES 492- Senior Design Project I - Fall 2009

ES 493 - Senior Design Project II -  Fall 2009/Spring 2010

Check for updates - Last updated: 09/28/2009

 

Description

Deliverables

Grading

Meetings

Forms

Schedule

Requirements

Project Leader

Notebook

Webpage

Proposed Projects

Description:

 

Capstone course calls on the professional skills of the discipline; it draws on the core disciplines of the students` major field of study, as well as explore necessary topics such as scheduling, organization, budgeting,, prototyping, develop teamwork, customer liaison skills, employ creativity in proposing new solutions, and so forth. Hence, by the end of the capstone process students are expected to have a good understanding about various design phases, including analysis phase, a design phase, a validation phase and a production phase.

 

 First Semester: Understanding principles of engineering design process, completing small group projects, formulating problem statement, analyzing requirements, delivering high-level design block diagram, and bill of materials.

 

Second Semester: Continuing the work in the first semester, refining, testing, and demonstrating the final product. Final prototype must be shown to meet initial specifications. Prerequisite: ES 592.

 

To the top

Objectives:

After successfully completing this course, a student should be able to:

 

1.      Apply engineering design principles to formulate problem statement, analyze requirements and produce a system-level block diagram.

2.      Prototype an electronic and/or software system to meet given specifications.

3.      Integrate knowledge from across the core CS or EE curriculum.

4.      Take a systems approach to problem solving.

5.      Work productively in a team environment.

6.      Effectively communicate technical ideas and concepts.

7.      Understand the environmental and social impacts of the design.

 

To the top

 

Project Requirements:

Completing the capstone project will require spending significant time and resources. Hence, all students are highly encouraged to find a project topic that is interesting to them. However, I highly encourage students to be open minded and consider the case that many projects, although initially don`t seem to be attractive and appealing, may turn out to be very interesting.

 

Although, individual students are allowed to find their own project, all capstone projects must meet the following criteria:

 

1-     Customer driven: In general, sources of projects are preferred to be Industry sponsored (Real-world problem from local industry or Support provided for materials and other expenses), Faculty Research based (Projects funded by research grants) or Competition based (examples are ASME Human Powered Vehicle, SAE Mini Baja, ASME annual design competition). In either case, all capstone projects must have an external client (customer). That is, projects cannot be proposed by participating students (exceptions will be made in special circumstances). Therefore, students working in a company are strongly recommended to talk to their co-workers and find a sponsor (customer) at work. All students are expected to produce industry-standard deliverables throughout the two-semester course. All project sponsors (clients) must complete the sponsorship sheet and sign it in order for the project to be officially considered as a capstone project.

2-     Team oriented: All projects must be done in teams of 2-3 students (exceptions will be made in special circumstances). You are highly encouraged to find students from other disciplines to assist you in the project. Sometimes, these students can actually receive credit toward their major in forms of Independent Study or Research Project. I strongly encourage you to consider teaming us with students majoring in Arts. Environmental Sciences, Computer Science, Biology and/or Physics.

3-     User friendly: All final projects must be operational and easily useable by external clients. Hence, all projects must be accompanied in a (software or hardware) package ready for the client to use.

 

Please note that all final projects, engineering notebooks, and ideas developed throughout the project are considered to be intellectual properties of Sonoma State University (or the sponsoring clients) and cannot be sold

or used commercially without its written permission.

 

To the top

 

Project Leader/Management:

 

In order to facilitate team organization and communication, each team will have one member who is designated as the project manager. This position can be permanent or rotate amongst the team members. The project manager is decided by the team and advisor.

 

Responsibilities of the project manager include:

  1. functioning as liaison between the team and the advisor;

  2. insuring that deadlines are met ;

  3. insuring that the team is prepared for the weekly advisor meetings ;

  4. being responsible for assembling weekly team report.

 

In addition, the team leader is responsible responsible for logistics and confirmations associated with weekly team meetings, weekly advisor meetings, deliverables, and Demo Day. This includes room and presentation equipment reservations. In addition, the project leader must ensure that all meeting minutes are posted online in a timely manner.

 

It should be noted that other team members will have areas of responsibility defined as the project moves forward. The role of project manager is clearly defined early in the process due to the general logistical nature of the role. The project manager offers general support of the design effort while the other roles will be tailored to project-specific needs.

 

To the top

Notebook:

Engineering laboratory notebooks are legal documents that can be used in court to prove ownership of a design. You are to keep notes in a bound notebook (one for each team member). Before using the notebook, number all the pages. This book is to be taken with you to your meetings with your advisor. It will be used to monitor your progress and demonstrate to your advisor the ownership of your design. No electronic notebook is acceptable.

 

To the top

Weekly Team Meetings:

Weekly team meetings are for the team members to meet with each other. This can be either before or after the weekly advisor meetings. You are encouraged to meet before the meeting with your advisor in order to be prepared to make the best use of the time.

 

Weekly/Biweekly Advisor Meetings:

Each project team will have a weekly team meeting with their project advisor. The purpose of each meeting is to have each team member report on progress that has been made, barriers that have been identified and clarification of short- and long-term goals. It is the project manager`s responsibility to set up these meetings with the project advisor. All members must participate in these meetings and be prepared to elaborate on their activities. All weekly Advisor Meeting minutes must be typed and posted online.

To the top

 

Web Page

It is mandatory for each team to create a web page dedicated to the Senior Design Project. Contents of this page must be saved on a CD and submitted along with the final deliverables. Your project documents can be shared in sites such as SlideShare . The web site must include the following components:

1-     Summary of the requirements and project.

2-     Name of the client.

3-     Team members, each member`s background and role in the project. Link to personal web page of each member must be included.

4-     Each project must have a discussion group and members are expected to communicate with one another through the discussion group.

5-     All projects must have a YouTube link describing how the project operates.

6-     All the links and references must be saved on a http://delicious.com/ link. For each link, a short description must be provided.

7-      Summary of all meeting minutes must be posted on the web site.

To the top

 

Grading:

Team members will be graded individually by their project advisors. After the Mid-course Design Review, the Design Review Board will recommend semester grades for each team member based on the report and oral presentation. The project advisors will take this feedback into account when assigning the semester grade.

 

The team members may receive different letter grades. Your performance on your portion of the project, contributions towards progress reports and your participation level in the weekly meetings will impact your final grade. The importance of each member`s preparedness and participation in the weekly meetings is crucial to the success of the projects. Please note that teams/individuals which did not complete the first semester requirements satisfactorily will not be allowed to take the second semester of the Senior Design Project course.

 

Grading policy:

Class Assignments 20%
Individual progress (*) 30%
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) - Team effort 20%
Mid-course Design Review (MDR) - Team effort 30%
Any unexcused absence (Mondays or Fridays)(**) -2%

(*) You will receive maximum of 3% for your progress in each individual meeting - individual progress will be determined based on amount of individual work recorded in the Engineering Notebook.

(**) Missing more than 15 minutes of any class/meeting results in an unexcused absence - please don`t be late!

 

To the top

Suggested Text:

  1. Practical Engineering Design by Maja Bystrom, Bruce Eisenstein

  2. J. E. Salt and R. Rothery, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers, Wiley, 2002, ISBN 0-471-39146-8

To the top

 

Course Deliverables:

In addition to the weekly team meetings and advisor meetings, the schedule includes all-course meetings and deliverables:

  1. Project Web Site

  2. Problem Statement and Problem Solution

  3. Project Schedule (Gantt Chart PS)

  4. Requirement Specifications

  5. Project Budget and Economic Analysis (include it in PS)

  6. System Block Diagram

  7. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

  8. Bill of materials (BOM)

  9. Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

  10. Simulation Results

  11. Mid-Term Design Review (MDR)

  12. User Document (DR) **

  13. Test Plan (include simulation results)

  14. Comprehensive Design Review (CDR) **

  15. Poster **

  16. Public Demo **

  17. Final Product **

 

[** document must be submitted the second semester. ]

 

The contents of the Preliminary Design Review (PDR), Mid-Term Design Review (MDR) and Comprehensive Design Review (CDR), will be as follow (refer to the provided Sample Report for details):

A-    Title page

B-    Executive Summary

C-    Abstract

D-    Table of Contents

E-     List of Figures

F-     List of Tables

G-    List of Abbreviations

H-    Introduction

I-       Body

a.       Problem statement

b.      Literature review/ existing patents

c.       Design approach

d.      Economic analysis

e.       Timeline or Gantt chart

f.        Social and environmental impact

g.       Future work

J-      Summary

K-   Glossary

L-       Reference (Note a)

M-  Appendices

a.       Detail budgets

b.      Test plan/procedures/results including simulations

c.       System block diagram

d.      Circuit diagrams

e.       Flowcharts

f.        In-depth description of technology and components used it the project

g.       Bill of materials

h.       Program codes

i.         Images of the final product

j.        Screen shots of the software interface

 

Details of the deliverables are described in the section below.

 

[Note (a) Do not use online references unless it belongs to a recognized organization or standard body]

 

To the top

 

Problem Statement Assignment

You are asked to prepare a statement of work for the project you have chosen. It is to be a team effort (one report per team). You are encouraged to work closely with your advisor on this assignment, but remember that you, not your advisor, are responsible for it. The page limit for this assignment is 4-6 pages.

Requirement Specification Assignment

You are asked to prepare a requirement specification for the project you have chosen. It is to be a team effort (one report per team). You are encouraged to work closely with your advisor on this assignment. The page limit for this assignment is 7-10 pages.

Proposed Schedule (Gantt Chart)

Each project is required to have a Project Schedule. A good scheduling allows the best result through the most effective use of all resources. Learning the project process and using the appropriate tools for scheduling can save considerable time and improve the final design project. All students are recommended to use MS Project Management software to complete the schedule.

Once the project schedule is defined, it is the team`s responsibility to ensure all deadlines are met. Schedules are evaluated at each Advisor Meeting.

Project Cost

Each project is required to have a preliminary projected cost. Such economic analysis allows designers to have a better understanding as to how much time they will be expected to devote to the project and how much money is required to spend on the project. The cost analysis allows designers to have a more realities view of their design before they get too involved in building it. You are encouraged to work closely with your advisor on this assignment, but remember that you, not your advisor, are responsible for it. This document must clearly identify the source of funding for the project. The cost of the following must be itemized in your budget:

1- Engineering development cost

2- Production cost

3- Labor cost

4- External services cost.

Students are highly recommended to your MS Project Management Software (a good tutorial is available HERE).

Social and Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)

All teams are required to complete and present EIP prior to implementing the design. This document must discuss possible environmental hazards of the design while operating and when it is disposed in landfills. The report must specify all specific measurements and steps which were taken to make the design more environmentally friendly, such modular design, recyclables of the product, upgradeability, usage of hazardous materials such as Coltan, mercury, lead, etc.

In addition, this document must clearly identify possible unintentional and negative social impacts. For example, what are the possible unconventional application of the design which can result in harmful ways.

System Block Diagram Assignment

The team is to prepare a block diagram of a system that will meet the specifications in the requirement specifications. A general description of how the system works and a plan for the system analysis must accompany the block diagram. (Note: Only a plan for how the system will be analyzed is required.) The analysis plan will point out things like:

1. The system will be modeled mathematically and analyzed using transform theory.

2. The system is very non-linear and cannot be linearized over the region of operation therefore the system must be analyzed through computer simulation.

3. The key to the system lies in the performance of a particular block and it is essential that this block is built and its performance measured as part of the system analysis.

 

The analysis plan should also contain estimates of how long it will take to complete the analysis. You are encouraged to work closely with your advisor. The grading guide for this assignment is attached. The page limit for this assignment is 4-6 pages.

Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

 

The twofold purpose of the PDR is for the team to present their preliminary design and receive feedback from the Faculty Review Board on that design. At the PDR, each team will deliver a written report presentation to the Faculty Review Board and team advisor. Each team member will participate in the preparation of the report as well as the preparation and delivery of the PowerPoint presentation. The report and presentation will include problem statement, requirement specifications, system-level block diagram and project specifications, as well as the team`s proposed MDR prototype specifications. The advisor and Faculty Review Board will modify the proposed MDR prototype specifications at the PDR. The MDR prototype specifications should be substantial and complete enough to demonstrate that the team has successfully tackled one or more of the core technical design challenges of the overall project. The MDR prototype specifications will be included in the team presentation to the class at an all-course meeting. The MDR prototype specifications will be sent to the SDP course coordinators by the project manager.

The project manager`s responsibility to schedule their team`s PDR.

Mid-Course Design Review (MDR)

 

The Mid-course Design Review (MDR) will take place before the Faculty Review Board and the team advisor near the end of the first part of the Capstone course. The twofold purpose of the MDR is for the team to present a prototype (and its associated design) and to receive feedback from the Faculty Review Board and the team advisor on that design. The hardware and/or software prototype presented should demonstrate that the chosen design path is likely to lead to a completed project in April which meets or exceeds the project specifications. The role of the Faculty Review Board is to provide independent feedback to the advisors and team members. The review board will consist of ES faculty members and will participate in all MDRs.

 

Each team will turn in a written report and deliver a PowerPoint presentation at the MDR. Each team member will participate in the preparation of the report as well as the preparation and delivery of the PowerPoint presentation. The MDR report and presentation will include problem statement, requirement specifications, system-level block diagram, project specifications, and an explanation and demonstration of how the MDR specifications were met this semester. Board suggests grade to advisor

The project manager is responsible to schedule the specific MDR time for their team.

Test Result Document (TRD)

The Test Result Document (TRD) includes all test results, design constraints, and operational limitations found during testing of the final product. This document also includes all the simulation results implemented for each system block. A comprehension comparison between the simulation and actual results must be presented and sufficient discussions must be accompanied.

Comprehensive Design Review (CDR):

CDR must be presented to Faculty Review Board and Project Advisor. CDR includes poster presentation. The CDR presentation focuses on a working demonstration of how the prototyped software/hardware meets the project specifications. The board suggests grade to advisor.

 

To the top

 

Forms:

The following templates and forms are available for students.

 

Document

Description

Examination of Problem Statement

Rubrics to grade individual documents

Faculty Advisor Approvals Form

Must be completed for receiving final grade for each semester

Faculty Advisor Survey

 

Faculty Advisor Meeting Log Sheet

Must be completed by the faculty for each student after the Advisor Meeting

Report Rubric

Various rubrics for grading

Part Request Form

List of materials required by the teach to be purchased

Equipment Request Form

Equipment required to be checked out by the team ; many equipments require receiving certification fro the department

Project External Support Form

 

Equipment Usage Certification

This form is required if you are planning to check out any equipment or more any equipment between rooms or buildings

Poster Guidelines

 

 

 

 

 

To the top

 

Schedule: (University Calendar)

#

Week of

Lecture

Reading Materials

Assignment/Activity

1

Aug. 26

-    Welcome/Syllabus

 

-    Read the syllabus

-     

2

Aug. 31

- Lecture-1: Engineering Process

 

 

3

Sep. 7

NO LECTURE

 

 - Send me your email to me!

- Complete HW1

- Make sure you get all your stuff out of 2007

4

Sep. 14

Lecture 2: Selecting a Project

Project Examples

 

- Team leader must Submit your team member`s name

-    Submit HW2

-    Select team`s Project Leader

- Assignment 2 - Due Sep 21

5 Sep. 21 Lecture 3- Engineering Specification - Visit the preserve
- Assignment 3 - Due Sep 28 -
 

 

 

-    Project Proposal Review

-   

-    Project Management with Microsoft Project - Tutorial

-     

-   

-     

6 Sep. 28  
- Discuss your progress
- Assign individual tasks
- Members; Receive a Faculty Advisor Meeting Log Sheet
- First  Individual Meeting
- Assignment 3 - is Due
- Submit your Webpage link / http://delicious.com/ (Note 4) / YouTube / SlideShare ; Example of a good SDP webpage
- Must have your Notebook ready.  

 

 

-    Project Proposal Review

-    Project Scheduling and Cost

- Here are just some ideas to think about Advanced Research Projects and some more ideas    

MS Project Management

 Acceptable Projects:

 

 

-    HW1: Project management assignment (due)

-    HW2: Project cost assignment

-   

7

Oct. 5

-    Design Documentation

-    Review Team`s Project

 

 

-    Submit project statement and possible solution ideas (example) - This is the abstract for your project.

- Submit the first draft fro Engineering Requirements

- Submit the first draft of Marketing Requirements; include all your questions from the client

- Submit individual assignment for the next month and team leader until December; group confirmation is required.

-

8 Oct. 12 No Lecture No Lecture 
- Field Survey; Test your wireless
- Complete a survey of 5 different wireless technologies.
- Submit
- Review Client Information Form (Note 3)
- Research about the existing electrical system
- Friday: Client Presentation; Arrange with Claudia 

 

   

- Social and Environmental Impact /RoHS

-    Intellectual Property 

 

 

 

9

Oct. 19

 

-    Individual Members

- Second Advisor Meeting-   

 

-    Report your wireless test results.

Submit Client Information Form (Note 3) - must be signed by the client

-    Submit a Progress Report (Note 1)

-  Submit project team member responsibility (Note 2)

-    Submit system block diagram ; First  presentation

10

Oct. 26

-    Third Advisor Meeting

 

 -    Submit your project schedule and potential cost (example of Project Schedule)

-    HW2: Submit Project cost assignment

 

11

Nov. 2

-    Meeting with Individual Members

 

-    Submit simulation tools/results/needs/justifications ; Discussion

-    Submit an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

12

Nov. 9

-     

 

-    Submit bill of materials (BOM)- Example of BOM / Include costs / All requested items must be individually justified.

-    Fill out the part request form.

-     

13

Nov. 16

-    Fourth Advisor Meeting

-    Meeting with Individual Members

 

-    Submit first draft of the PDR to all faculty members

-    Fill out Equipment Request Form for your project Submit your preliminary Test plan ; How are you going to test the project? What are you going to test?

0

Nov. 23

NO CLASS

NO CLASS

-    NO CLASS

15

Nov. 30

-    Meeting with Individual Members

GLOBECOM Nov. 30 ; Dec. 4

-    Final Presentation is due

-    Must receive approval of faculty members.

16

Dec. 7

-     

 

 

17

 

-    Project update

-    Meeting with Individual Members

 

 

18

 

-    How to Present

 

 

 

 

-     

 

 

Note 1 : Each week teams are required to submit/post a progress report.

Note 2 : If there is any change in team member`s role the advisor must be notified.

Note 3 : All documents must be posted on the web page

Note 4 : All references must be accompanied with a summer

 

 

To the top


Potential Presenters:

 

Robert Business

Sasha ; sustainability

Merith ; assistive living

Lynn ; Kinisiology

Claudia ; Environment

My presentation ; my stuff

Sasha

RoHS