|
|
Study Guide III: "The good, the bad, &
the ugly"
Material covered will be from 11/9 through 12/9.
Steps to success:
- Begin using this study guide 11/9 [11/16 is
probably more realistic], not the weekend before the
exam!
- Review Vocabulary List 5 and
List 6.
- READ
- For sample exam questions, see case outside
D234.
- Review self-quiz 8.
- READ again.
Study exercises and
questions:
1. Summarize the immune response to tumor cells.
Which is more effective, a humoral response or a cell
mediated response? Support your answer.
2. What is hypersensitivity? What parts of the
immune response lead to hypersensitivity?
- What are the Gel and Coombs types? For each type of
hypersensitivity, list the cells and chemicals involved,
give examples of antigens involved, and give a brief
description of the response.
- What is anaphylaxis? How can it be controlled?
- Give four examples of diseases associated with
hypersensitivity?
- Describe their key characteristics.
- Why are autoimmune diseases considered to be
hypersensitivity diseases?
- What understanding regarding immune function can be
gained by studying hypersensitivity?
3. What does "immunodeficiency" mean? What is the
difference between primary and secondary
immunodeficiency?
- What parts of the immune system are involved in
immunodeficiency when they are lacking or
dysfunctional?
- Give one example each of primary immunodeficiencies
involving T cells, B cells, phagocytes, and C'. Describe
cause, symptoms, and prognosis or outcome.
- What understanding regarding immune function can be
gained by studying immunodeficiency?
- Summarize how HIV causes immunodeficiency. Why is
this infection different from most viral infections?
4. For transplants to be accepted, a patient is
given immunosuppressants, which induce a therapeutic
immunodeficiency. Why is this necessary? What are the risks
of using immunosuppressive drugs?
5. What is "passive immunity"?
- What are two examples of natural passive
immunity?
- When would therapeutic passive immunization be used?
Give some examples.
6. What is "immunization" or "vaccination"? How
does this type of "active immunization" differ from passive
immunization?
- Give two examples of vaccines and why they are
used?
- Give an example for each of the following: whole-cell
vaccine, sub-unit vaccine, recombinant vaccine.
- What is a toxoid? How is it prepared?
- What is the difference between "killed" and
"attenuated" viral vaccines?
- How can passive immunity interfere with active
immunization? Give two examples to illustrate.
- Give two examples of antibody production for
research, commercial, or diagnostic applications. Include
target antigen, means of antibody production, and applied
use.
7. Make a summary diagram of the evolution of
immune system and responses.
- At what point and in which animals did the various
cells develop? Do analogous cells exist in other phyla
which arose from different lineages?
- Follow the diversification of the Ig supergene family
through evolution.
- Describe two unique structures, cells, or chemicals
involved in immune responses NOT found in mammals.
8. Regarding "Optional topics": Diagram, chart and
summarize as you have done all semester. Generate questions
related to the topics and share them with your group members
and study buddies.
[top of
page]
Summary Questions for Final Review
1. Another adaptive transfer game: Mice of H-2
(a/a) strain [homozygous strain at MHC] were
sublethally irradiated [All mature lymphocytes were
killed; stem cells were unaffected.] In addition, they
were thymectomized just prior to irradiation.
2. Some elderly people living in a residential
home were part of an experiment on stress and NK cell
activity. One group served as a control and did nothing
differently in their daily activities. A second group
participated in more interactive activities, including craft
projects and field trips to museums and concerts. A third
group were taught active coping skills and relaxation
techniques. At the end of the study, it was found that the
third group showed improved NK cell activity. The second
group showed no change from that at the beginning of the
study or from the control group. However, both the second
and third groups reported subjectively feeling better about
themselves and about things in general. The control group
reported no change in attitude.
- Describe a probable mechanism for the effect seen in
the third group. Include the source and mediators
involved, as well as the target(s) for the
mediators.
- Both the second and third groups reported improved
outlook, yet only the third group improved their NK
activity. What is a probable explanation for this
difference?
- What would be another type of indicator system which
could be used to study the effects of stress? How would
you construct your study? [Be brief.]
3. Under normal circumstances, humans do not make
antibodies to self-components, e.g., red blood cell
antigens. What are three possible explanations for this type
of self-tolerance?
- Following a penetrating injury to one eye, a 30
year-old patient was found to have antibodies to retinal
antigens. These antibodies were causing major
complications in the healing of the eye. This patient had
no prior history of autoimmune disease.
- Would antibodies to retinal antigens normally be
found? Why (not)?
- Why did this patient develop antibodies to the
retinal antigens?
4. As a young physician interested in immunology,
you have a brilliant idea. One common type of leukemia is a
cancer of the lymphocyte. Why not irradiate these leukemia
patients with a dose of X rays sufficient to destroy all
their lymphocytes (i.e., normal and leukemic cells) and then
give them an adoptive transfer of spleen cells form another
individual? The host's immune system is destroyed, hence the
cancer should be cured. An older colleague finds your
proposal highly amusing. Give two reasons why and
discuss.
- Your colleague suggests that a better alternative
would be to remove some of the patient's bone marrow
before whole-body irradiation and treat the stem cells in
vitro to remove the leukemic cells, and then return the
bone marrow to the patient following the irradiation.
Describe one way in which leukemia cells could be removed
in vitro. What are the possible limitations of your
method?
5. Upon examining Z cells isolated from Horta, the
cells were shown to be defense cells. It was found that they
reproduced primarily in response to an autocrine signal. In
other words, Z cells produced a stimulating factor and also
expressed receptors for the stimulating factor. When
cultured in vitro, they only produced the stimulating
factor if physically disturbed or if toxins were added.
Describe the advantages of this reproductive system for Z
cells in vivo. What are some of the possible
disadvantages?
6. If a kidney patient could choose between an HLA
haplo-identical sibling (only one HLA haplotype matched) or
a parent as a possible donor, who will you recommend?
Why?
7. An 81 year old woman was admitted to the
hospital with wheezing and difficulty breathing. The
attending physician noted that the symptoms were similar to
asthma, and prescribed corticosteroid treatment. There was
some initial improvement; but after five
days, she was having increased difficulty. A sputum
sample was cultured and examined microscopically. The
cultures were positive for an excessive amount of a species
of bacteria seen in normal flora. In addition, some
parasitic worms were noted in the sputum. These were
identified as being of a species rarely seen in the U.S.,
yet common in South America. In reviewing her history, it
was noted that she had lived in Peru until she was 27 years
old. Other than occasional colds, she reported no
respiratory problems during her time in Peru or since she
moved to California. There was no prior history of her
current symptoms.
- What is the primary cause of this woman's respiratory
problems? What is your rationale?
- Was the use of corticosteroids a good idea? Why
(not)?
- Is it possible that she was infected with the worms
for over 50 years? Why (not)?
8. You've just spent two months and $10,000
purifying a unique enzyme from a rare strain of yeast which
yields a high quality product important to the food
industry. To become marketable, you need to develop a high
yield cost effective method of purification. Affinity
chromatography using antibodies specific for the enzyme
might be the perfect approach. You've agreed to a challenge
from a colleague to produce the best antibody for the job.
[The stakes: the loser pays for a week in Hawaii for the
winner.]
Day 1: You arrive in the lab to find your
competition has helped herself to 800 mg of your precious
enzyme. You only have 100 mg left. You decide on a
three-dose immunization schedule over six weeks using 1
mg per dose. You also decide to use an oil based adjuvant
and to inject subcutaneously. Your competitor is giving
away no information just yet.
Seven weeks later: At this time you discover
that your competitor used a two-dose immunization
schedule at a four-week interval and injected
intravenously. She used 400 mg per dose, therefore she
has a rabbit worth nearly $9000, but no enzyme left for
testing the antisera. [It is a good thing the rabbit
is alive and well.] With some of your remaining
enzyme, you both test your rabbits for antibody titer,
major isotype, and relative affinity. You have test
bleeds taken 6 days after the second and third
immunizations. Your competitor has test bleeds taken 6
days, 14 days, and 21 days after the second
immunization.
- Who won?
- Describe why, including information on relative
titer, isotype, and relative affinity of the antibodies
produced.
10. When the nerve endings at neuromuscular
junctions release acetylcholine [ACH], muscles are
stimulated to contract. ACH binds to acetylcholine-receptors
[AChR] on muscle cell membranes, which depolarize
the membranes and initiate contractions. A group of clinical
researchers injected rats with 1.1 to 350 picomoles of
purified electric eel AChR protein suspended on complete
Freund's adjuvant. This immunization elicited a set of
physical symptoms that included weight loss, generalized
muscle weakness, a characteristic hunched posture with chin
and elbows off the floor, and jerky movements of the head
and forelimbs when attempting ambulation. The animals were
graded, as shown in the table, on the following simple
scale: 0, no definite weakness; +, weak grip with
fatigability; ++, hunched posture with head down and
movements uncoordinated; +++, severe generalized weakness,
no grip, tremulous, moribund.
[top of
page]
|
|