Oral Presentation Rubric
Name: ______________________________Date: _______________
|
|
Outstanding 4 |
Good 3 |
Acceptable 2 |
In serious need of improvement
1 |
|
Content |
Question or purpose of study clearly stated. Points are clearly made and all evidence presented is relevant to question |
Sufficient information that relates to thesis; many good points
made but there is an uneven balance and little variation |
There is a great deal of information that is not clearly
connected to the thesis |
Question not presented; information included that is not relevant to topic in question |
|
Coherence and Organization |
Thesis is clearly stated and developed; specific examples are
appropriate and clearly develop thesis; conclusion is clear; shows control;
flows together well; good transitions; succinct but not choppy; well
organized |
Most information presented in logical sequence; generally very well
organized but better transitions from idea to idea and medium to medium
needed |
Concept and ideas are loosely connected; lacks clear
transitions; flow and organization are choppy |
Presentation is choppy and disjointed; does not flow; development
of thesis is vague; no apparent logical order of presentation |
|
Creativity |
Very original presentation of material; uses the unexpected to
full advantage; captures audience's attention |
Some originality apparent; good variety and blending of
materials/media |
Little or no variation; material presented with little
originality or interpretation |
Repetitive with little or no variety; insufficient use of
multimedia |
|
Powerpoint |
Slides highlight central concepts Facilitate understanding of oral presentation Font size large enough to facilitate reading Outline format Quantity of text adequate, not too lengthy |
Use of multimedia not as varied and not as well connected to
thesis |
Choppy use of multimedia materials; lacks smooth transition from
one medium to another; multimedia not clearly connected to thesis |
Little or no multimedia used or ineffective use of multimedia;
imbalance in use of materials—too much of one, not enough of another |
|
Speaking Skills |
Poised, clear articulation; proper volume; steady rate; good
posture and eye contact; enthusiasm; confidence |
Clear articulation but not as polished |
Some mumbling; little eye contact; uneven rate; little or no
expression |
Inaudible or too loud; no eye contact; rate too slow/fast;
speaker seemed uninterested and used monotone |
|
Audience Response |
Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in
creative way; held the audience's attention throughout |
Presented facts with some interesting "twists"; held
the audience's attention most of the time |
Some related facts but went off topic and lost the audience;
mostly presented facts with little or no imagination |
Incoherent; audience lost interest and could not determine the
point of the presentation |
|
Length of Presentation |
Within two minutes of allotted time +/- |
Within four minutes of allotted time +/- |
Within six minutes of allotted time +/- |
Too long or too short; ten or more minutes +/- below the
allotted time |